Head-to-Head Comparison

Maven Trading vs Ment Funding (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare Maven Trading against Ment Funding across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

Maven Trading

8.1/10

80% split·Up to $100,000 purchasable (scaling to $1,000,000)

Review Visit

Ment Funding

7.9/10

75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%) split·Up to $2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling)

Review Visit

Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, Maven Trading edges out the competition in this matchup. While Ment Funding remains an excellent choice for forex traders, instant funding seekers, Maven Trading proves superior due to its widest instrument selection — stocks, bonds, etfs included and very low entry point from just $25.

Which is better, Maven Trading or Ment Funding?

Quick Comparison

Metric	Maven Trading	Ment Funding	Winner
Founded	2023	2021	Draw
Overall Rating	8.1/10	7.9/10	Maven Trading
Profit Split	80%	75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%)	Ment Funding
Max Account Size	$100,000 purchasable (scaling to $1,000,000)	$2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling)	Ment Funding
Lowest Challenge Fee	$15	$325	Maven Trading
Payout Frequency	Every 10 business days after your first trade	First withdrawal on demand, then every 30 days (Equities: first after 14 days, then every 14)	Draw
Minimum Payout	3% profit on the account	$100	Draw
Platforms	MT5, cTrader, Match Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate (Futures), NinjaTrader (Futures)	MT5, Match-Trader	Maven Trading
Instruments	Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Bonds, Crypto, ETFs	Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Futures, Equities	Maven Trading
Challenge Types	7	3	Maven Trading
Headquarters	Vancouver, Canada	Pennsylvania, United States	Draw

Maven Trading vs Ment Funding: Challenge Fees Compared

Maven Trading offers 6 account tiers with fees starting from $15. Ment Funding counters with 7 options starting from $325. Maven Trading is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

Maven Trading Fees

$2,000$15

$5,000$19

$10,000$37

$20,000$68

$50,000$170

$100,000$380

Ment Funding Fees

$25,000$325

$50,000$585

$100,000$1,105

$200,000$2,145

$400,000$4,225

$1,000,000$9,750

$2,000,000$21,000

Trading Rules: Maven Trading vs Ment Funding

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. Maven Trading enforces a max drawdown of 5% and daily drawdown of 3%, with a profit target of 8%. Ment Funding sets a max drawdown at 6% static and daily drawdown at 5%, requiring traders to hit 10%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

Rule	Maven Trading	Ment Funding
Max Drawdown	5%	6% static
Daily Drawdown	3%	5%
Profit Target	8%	10%
Profit Split	80%	75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%)

Platform & Tools Comparison

Maven Trading supports MT5, cTrader, Match Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate (Futures), NinjaTrader (Futures). Ment Funding provides access to MT5, Match-Trader. Maven Trading offers more platform variety.

MT5

Maven: ✓Ment: ✓

cTrader

Maven: ✓Ment: ✗

Match Trader

Maven: ✓Ment: ✗

TradeLocker

Maven: ✓Ment: ✗

Tradovate (Futures)

Maven: ✓Ment: ✗

NinjaTrader (Futures)

Maven: ✓Ment: ✗

Match-Trader

Maven: ✗Ment: ✓

Pros & Cons

Maven Trading

Widest instrument selection — stocks, bonds, ETFs included

Very low entry point from just $25

Browser-based Match Trader platform

TradingView charts integration

1, 2, and 3-step challenge options

80% profit split

Newer firm with limited track record

Payouts via USDT only

Withdrawal processing up to 10 days

Ment Funding

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog

Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place

Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison

Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like Ment Funding

Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture

Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site

Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms

Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Expert Analysis

When placing Maven Trading and Ment Funding side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. Maven Trading, operating since 2023 out of Vancouver, Canada, has built its model around Standard 1-Step and Standard 2-Step evaluations with a 80% profit split and accounts up to $100,000 purchasable (scaling to $1,000,000). Their platform offering (MT5, cTrader, Match Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate (Futures), NinjaTrader (Futures)) covers Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Bonds, Crypto, ETFs. Ment Funding, headquartered in Pennsylvania, United States since 2021, takes a different approach with Forex (1-Step) and Futures models, offering 75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%) profit sharing on accounts up to $2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling). They support MT5, Match-Trader across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Futures, Equities. The Bottom Line: If you value widest instrument selection — stocks, bonds, etfs included, Maven Trading is the logical choice. If you prefer now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog and want access to MT5, Ment Funding earns our recommendation.

Last reviewed:September 2, 2026

•

By:BrokerAnalysis Research Desk

•

Fact-checked by:BrokerAnalysis Editorial Team

Written by BrokerAnalysis Research Desk. Fact-checked by BrokerAnalysis Editorial Team. Data reflects provider disclosures and payouts verified as of 2026-09-02.

Sources & References

Our methodology for ranking trading providers— BrokerAnalysis
Editorial policy and research standards— BrokerAnalysis
Data sources used across reviews and comparisons— BrokerAnalysis
Maven Trading review and rules— BrokerAnalysis
Ment Funding review and rules— BrokerAnalysis
BrokerAnalysis ranking methodology— BrokerAnalysis

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost

Maven Trading

Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.

Highest Profit Split

Ment Funding

Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.

Platform Variety

Maven Trading

Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.

Market Coverage

Maven Trading

Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Maven Trading better than Ment Funding?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **Maven Trading** edges out the competition in this matchup. While Ment Funding remains an excellent choice for forex traders, instant funding seekers, Maven Trading proves superior due to its widest instrument selection — stocks, bonds, etfs included and very low entry point from just $25.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: Maven Trading or Ment Funding?

Maven Trading offers a 80% profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%). Ment Funding gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: Maven Trading or Ment Funding?

Maven Trading's lowest challenge fee is $15, while Ment Funding starts at $325. Maven Trading is the more affordable option.

What platforms do Maven Trading and Ment Funding support?

Maven Trading supports MT5, cTrader, Match Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate (Futures), NinjaTrader (Futures). Ment Funding supports MT5, Match-Trader.

Are Maven Trading and Ment Funding legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. Maven Trading was founded in 2023 and is based in Vancouver, Canada. Ment Funding was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Pennsylvania, United States. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.