Head-to-Head Comparison

FunderPro vs Ment Funding (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare FunderPro against Ment Funding across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

FunderPro logo

FunderPro

7.9/10
80% on One Phase and Classic; up to 90% on Pro split·Up to $200,000 on challenges, $100,000 on Instant
Ment Funding logo

Ment Funding

7.9/10
75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%) split·Up to $2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling)
Our Verdict

Both FunderPro and Ment Funding are strong prop trading firms with distinct strengths. FunderPro is best for forex traders, instant funding seekers, while Ment Funding excels for forex traders, instant funding seekers. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize weekly usdc payouts — fastest in industry or now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog.

Which is better, FunderPro or Ment Funding?

Both FunderPro and Ment Funding are strong prop trading firms with distinct strengths. FunderPro is best for forex traders, instant funding seekers, while Ment Funding excels for forex traders, instant funding seekers. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize weekly usdc payouts — fastest in industry or now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog.

Quick Comparison

MetricFunderProMent FundingWinner
Founded20232021Draw
Overall Rating7.9/107.9/10Draw
Profit Split80% on One Phase and Classic; up to 90% on Pro75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%)Ment Funding
Max Account Size$200,000 on challenges, $100,000 on Instant$2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling)Ment Funding
Lowest Challenge Fee$69$325FunderPro
Payout FrequencyBi-weekly on One Phase and Classic; on demand or weekly on ProFirst withdrawal on demand, then every 30 days (Equities: first after 14 days, then every 14)Draw
Minimum Payout$100 on the Instant Program; Pro requires 1% above the starting balance$100Draw
PlatformsMT5, cTraderMT5, Match-TraderDraw
InstrumentsForex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFsForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Futures, EquitiesDraw
Challenge Types43FunderPro
HeadquartersSliema, MaltaPennsylvania, United StatesDraw

FunderPro vs Ment Funding: Challenge Fees Compared

FunderPro offers 7 account tiers with fees starting from $69. Ment Funding counters with 7 options starting from $325. FunderPro is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

FunderPro Fees

$5,000$69
$10,000$109
$25,000$219
$50,000$319
$100,000$539
$150,000$799
$200,000$989

Ment Funding Fees

$25,000$325
$50,000$585
$100,000$1,105
$200,000$2,145
$400,000$4,225
$1,000,000$9,750
$2,000,000$21,000

Trading Rules: FunderPro vs Ment Funding

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. FunderPro enforces a max drawdown of 10% and daily drawdown of 5%, with a profit target of 10% then 5%. Ment Funding sets a max drawdown at 6% static and daily drawdown at 5%, requiring traders to hit 10%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleFunderProMent Funding
Max Drawdown10%6% static
Daily Drawdown5%5%
Profit Target10% then 5%10%
Profit Split80% on One Phase and Classic; up to 90% on Pro75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%)

Platform & Tools Comparison

FunderPro supports MT5, cTrader. Ment Funding provides access to MT5, Match-Trader. Both firms provide a similar range of platforms.

MT5
FunderPro: Ment:
cTrader
FunderPro: Ment:
Match-Trader
FunderPro: Ment:

Pros & Cons

FunderPro

Weekly USDC payouts — fastest in industry
$50 minimum payout — very low
Wide instrument selection including ETFs
Expert Advisors (EAs) allowed
Up to 90% profit split
Crypto payouts only (USDC)
MT5 platform only
Newer firm
Need to convert USDC to fiat manually

Ment Funding

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog
Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place
Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison
Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like Ment Funding
Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture
Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site
Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms
Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Expert Analysis

When placing FunderPro and Ment Funding side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. FunderPro, operating since 2023 out of Sliema, Malta, has built its model around One Phase and Classic (2-Phase) evaluations with a 80% on One Phase and Classic; up to 90% on Pro profit split and accounts up to $200,000 on challenges, $100,000 on Instant. Their platform offering (MT5, cTrader) covers Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs. Ment Funding, headquartered in Pennsylvania, United States since 2021, takes a different approach with Forex (1-Step) and Futures models, offering 75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%) profit sharing on accounts up to $2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling). They support MT5, Match-Trader across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Futures, Equities. The Bottom Line: If you value weekly usdc payouts — fastest in industry, FunderPro is the logical choice. If you prefer now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog and want access to MT5, Ment Funding earns our recommendation.
Last reviewed:
By:BrokerAnalysis Research Desk
Fact-checked by:BrokerAnalysis Editorial Team

Written by BrokerAnalysis Research Desk. Fact-checked by BrokerAnalysis Editorial Team. Data reflects provider disclosures and payouts verified as of 2026-09-02.

Sources & References

  1. BrokerAnalysis
  2. BrokerAnalysis
  3. BrokerAnalysis
  4. BrokerAnalysis
  5. BrokerAnalysis
  6. BrokerAnalysis

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
FunderPro
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Ment Funding
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FunderPro
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FunderPro
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FunderPro better than Ment Funding?

Both FunderPro and Ment Funding are strong prop trading firms with distinct strengths. FunderPro is best for forex traders, instant funding seekers, while Ment Funding excels for forex traders, instant funding seekers. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize weekly usdc payouts — fastest in industry or now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: FunderPro or Ment Funding?

FunderPro offers a 80% on One Phase and Classic; up to 90% on Pro profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%). Ment Funding gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: FunderPro or Ment Funding?

FunderPro's lowest challenge fee is $69, while Ment Funding starts at $325. FunderPro is the more affordable option.

What platforms do FunderPro and Ment Funding support?

FunderPro supports MT5, cTrader. Ment Funding supports MT5, Match-Trader.

Are FunderPro and Ment Funding legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. FunderPro was founded in 2023 and is based in Sliema, Malta. Ment Funding was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Pennsylvania, United States. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons

Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn commissions from partner links.|Risk Warning: Trading leveraged products involves significant risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors.