Head-to-Head Comparison

For Traders vs Ment Funding (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare For Traders against Ment Funding across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

For Traders

8/10

Up to 90% split·Up to $300,000

Review Visit

Ment Funding

7.9/10

75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%) split·Up to $2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling)

Review Visit

Our Verdict

Both For Traders and Ment Funding are strong prop trading firms with distinct strengths. For Traders is best for forex traders, while Ment Funding excels for forex traders, instant funding seekers. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog or now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog.

Which is better, For Traders or Ment Funding?

Quick Comparison

Metric	For Traders	Ment Funding	Winner
Founded	2023	2021	Draw
Overall Rating	8/10	7.9/10	For Traders
Profit Split	Up to 90%	75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%)	Ment Funding
Max Account Size	$300,000	$2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling)	Ment Funding
Lowest Challenge Fee	$49	$325	For Traders
Payout Frequency	On demand from the dashboard, under a 48-hour payout guarantee	First withdrawal on demand, then every 30 days (Equities: first after 14 days, then every 14)	Draw
Minimum Payout	$100	$100	Draw
Platforms	MT5, cTrader	MT5, Match-Trader	Draw
Instruments	Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto	Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Futures, Equities	Ment Funding
Challenge Types	4	3	For Traders
Headquarters	Prague, Czech Republic	Pennsylvania, United States	Draw

For Traders vs Ment Funding: Challenge Fees Compared

For Traders offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $49. Ment Funding counters with 7 options starting from $325. For Traders is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

For Traders Fees

$6,000$49

$15,000$99

$25,000$179

$50,000$249

$100,000$469

Ment Funding Fees

$25,000$325

$50,000$585

$100,000$1,105

$200,000$2,145

$400,000$4,225

$1,000,000$9,750

$2,000,000$21,000

Trading Rules: For Traders vs Ment Funding

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. For Traders enforces a max drawdown of 6% (trailing or static, selectable) and daily drawdown of 3%, with a profit target of 9%. Ment Funding sets a max drawdown at 6% static and daily drawdown at 5%, requiring traders to hit 10%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

Rule	For Traders	Ment Funding
Max Drawdown	6% (trailing or static, selectable)	6% static
Daily Drawdown	3%	5%
Profit Target	9%	10%
Profit Split	Up to 90%	75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%)

Platform & Tools Comparison

For Traders supports MT5, cTrader. Ment Funding provides access to MT5, Match-Trader. Both firms provide a similar range of platforms.

MT5

For: ✓Ment: ✓

cTrader

For: ✓Ment: ✗

Match-Trader

For: ✗Ment: ✓

Pros & Cons

For Traders

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog

Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place

Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison

Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like For Traders

Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture

Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site

Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms

Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Ment Funding

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog

Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place

Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison

Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like Ment Funding

Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture

Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site

Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms

Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Expert Analysis

When placing For Traders and Ment Funding side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. For Traders, operating since 2023 out of Prague, Czech Republic, has built its model around Forex Fast (1-Step) and Forex Classic (2-Step) evaluations with a Up to 90% profit split and accounts up to $300,000. Their platform offering (MT5, cTrader) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. Ment Funding, headquartered in Pennsylvania, United States since 2021, takes a different approach with Forex (1-Step) and Futures models, offering 75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%) profit sharing on accounts up to $2,000,000 purchasable directly; $5,000,000 via the scaling ladder (only sizes up to $1M qualify for scaling). They support MT5, Match-Trader across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Futures, Equities. The Bottom Line: If you value now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog, For Traders is the logical choice. If you prefer now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog and want access to MT5, Ment Funding earns our recommendation.

Last reviewed:September 2, 2026

•

By:BrokerAnalysis Research Desk

•

Fact-checked by:BrokerAnalysis Editorial Team

Written by BrokerAnalysis Research Desk. Fact-checked by BrokerAnalysis Editorial Team. Data reflects provider disclosures and payouts verified as of 2026-09-02.

Sources & References

Our methodology for ranking trading providers— BrokerAnalysis
Editorial policy and research standards— BrokerAnalysis
Data sources used across reviews and comparisons— BrokerAnalysis
For Traders review and rules— BrokerAnalysis
Ment Funding review and rules— BrokerAnalysis
BrokerAnalysis ranking methodology— BrokerAnalysis

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost

For Traders

Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.

Highest Profit Split

Ment Funding

Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.

Platform Variety

For Traders

Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.

Market Coverage

Ment Funding

Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is For Traders better than Ment Funding?

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: For Traders or Ment Funding?

For Traders offers a Up to 90% profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% default, 90% as a checkout add-on (Equities start at 80%). Ment Funding gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: For Traders or Ment Funding?

For Traders's lowest challenge fee is $49, while Ment Funding starts at $325. For Traders is the more affordable option.

What platforms do For Traders and Ment Funding support?

For Traders supports MT5, cTrader. Ment Funding supports MT5, Match-Trader.

Are For Traders and Ment Funding legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. For Traders was founded in 2023 and is based in Prague, Czech Republic. Ment Funding was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Pennsylvania, United States. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.