Trading Academy
Forex Glossary
Trading Guides
News
Blog
FxPro vs Markets.com (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare FxPro against Markets.com across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Which is better: FxPro or Markets.com?
Sources & References
- BrokerAnalysis ranking methodology— BrokerAnalysis
- BrokerAnalysis data sources— BrokerAnalysis
- BrokerAnalysis editorial policy— BrokerAnalysis
Verdict: FxPro Holds a Slight Edge
After side-by-side testing, **FxPro** holds a slight edge over Markets.com in this matchup. The gap is small and Markets.com remains an excellent choice — especially for beginner-to-intermediate multi-asset cfd traders who value research tools — but FxPro edges it on fca and cysec regulated and payout reliability.
FxPro vs Markets.com: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2008 |
| Overall Rating | 4.4/5.0 | 4.7/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Raw+) | 1.2 pips (Standard) | 0.6 pips |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:200 (Pro) | 1:30 (Retail) | 1:30 (UK/EU/AU retail) | up to 1:300 (Intl) |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| TradingView | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Forex Pairs | 70+ | 67 |
| Deposit Methods | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, PayPal | Bank, Card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1 business day | 1-2 business days |
| Execution Type | NDD / STP | Market Execution |
FxPro vs Markets.com: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between FxPro and Markets.com, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. FxPro offers pricing characterized by $3.50/lot (Raw+) alongside 0.0 pips (Raw+) | 1.2 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, Markets.com utilizes a model with $0 (spread-based on most CFDs) and 0.6 pips spreads. For active, high-volume traders, FxPro provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | FxPro | Markets.com |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Raw+) | 1.2 pips (Standard) | 0.6 pips |
| Commission Defaults | $3.50/lot (Raw+) | $0 (spread-based on most CFDs) |
| Execution Model | NDD / STP | Market Execution |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1 business day | 1-2 business days |
Safety & Regulation: Is FxPro or Markets.com Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both FxPro and Markets.com are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. FxPro is armed with 2 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2006. Markets.com, licensed since 2008, counters with 3 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. Markets.com holds a slight edge with more top-tier authorities. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.
FxPro
Tier 1- Regulators:FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)FSCA (South Africa)SCB (Bahamas)
- Investor Protection: £85,000 (FSCS) / €20,000 (ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2006
Markets.com
Tier 1- Regulators:FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)ASIC (Australia)FSCA (South Africa)FSA (BVI)
- Investor Protection: FSCS (UK) up to £85k; ICF (EU) up to €20k
- Licensed Since: 2008
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. FxPro equips its clients with MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro Platform. Markets.com, on the other hand, grants access to Marketsx, MT4, MT5. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | FxPro | Markets.com |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (FxPro Platform) | Yes (Marketsx) |
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: FxPro vs Markets.com
FxPro
Pros
- FCA and CySEC regulated
- cTrader integration
- No dealing desk execution
- FxPro Edge proprietary platform
- Negative balance protection
Cons
- $100 minimum deposit
- Wider spreads on standard accounts
- Inactivity fee after 1 year
Markets.com
Pros
- Strong tier-1 regulation (FCA, CySEC, ASIC)
- Easy-to-use Marketsx platform with sentiment tools
- Investment Strategy Builder & 'Blends'
- Very low 0.6 pip EUR/USD spread
- Backed by Finalto / Playtech (FTSE 250)
Cons
- Inactivity fee after just 3 months
- 0.6% currency conversion fee
- High overnight financing on some positions
- Fewer platform options vs pure ECN brokers
Expert Verdict: FxPro vs Markets.com
When we place FxPro and Markets.com side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. FxPro, licensed since 2006, has carved out a massive niche focusing on professional european traders & ctrader enthusiasts. Their execution model heavily leans into NDD / STP, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, Markets.com, operational out of London, UK / Limassol, Cyprus, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for beginner-to-intermediate multi-asset cfd traders who value research tools. Their $0 (spread-based on most CFDs) commission structure combined with 0.6 pips spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is fca and cysec regulated, and you intend to start with a minimum of $100, FxPro is the logical path forward. If, however, you value strong tier-1 regulation (fca, cysec, asic) and require Marketsx, Markets.com edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
FxPro vs Markets.com: Frequently Asked Questions
People Also Search For
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated August 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Editorial Policy | Data Sources | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy