Trading Academy
Forex Glossary
Trading Guides
News
Blog
HFM vs IC Markets (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare HFM against IC Markets across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Which is better: HFM or IC Markets?
Sources & References
- HFM Trading Accounts— HFM
- IC Markets Trading Accounts— IC Markets
- BrokerAnalysis ranking methodology— BrokerAnalysis
- BrokerAnalysis data sources— BrokerAnalysis
- BrokerAnalysis editorial policy— BrokerAnalysis
Verified promotions on this matchup
We keep this factual and secondary to safety, pricing, and platform fit. Terms still matter.
HFM
Deposit Match100% Supercharged Bonus + Daily Rebates
100% SuperCharged bonus credit plus daily rebates on qualifying Forex and Gold volume.
IC Markets
Cashback / RebateUp to $2.50/Lot Rebate + 21% Comm Off
Raw Trader Plus rebate up to $2.50/lot. Save ~$1.50/lot with 21% lifetime commission discount.
Verdict: On Par — Both Are Strong Picks
Both HFM and IC Markets are strong, well-regulated brokers and the matchup is essentially a tie on our weighted scoring. HFM is ideal for bonus hunters, high leverage users & versatile traders, while IC Markets excels for scalpers, ea traders & low-latency algorithmic trading. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize excellent mobile app functionality with in-app trading or consistently deepest liquidity and tightest raw spreads (0.0), not on a meaningful quality gap.
HFM vs IC Markets: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
| Overall Rating | 4.5/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $200 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 1.0 pips (Premium) | 0.0 pips (Zero) | 0.0 pips (Raw) | 0.8 pips (Standard) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:2000 (Global) | 1:30 (EU) | 1:1000 (Global) | 1:30 (Retail) |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | No | Yes |
| TradingView | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes (HFcopy) | Yes |
| Forex Pairs | 50+ | 61 |
| Deposit Methods | Card, Wire, Skrill, Neteller, Crypto | Card, PayPal, Neteller, Skrill, Wire, Broker-to-Broker |
| Withdrawal Speed | 24 hours | 24-48 hours |
| Execution Type | STP / ECN capabilities | True ECN |
HFM vs IC Markets: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between HFM and IC Markets, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. HFM offers pricing characterized by $3.00/lot (Zero Account) alongside 1.0 pips (Premium) | 0.0 pips (Zero) spreads. In contrast, IC Markets utilizes a model with $3.50/lot (Raw Spread) and 0.0 pips (Raw) | 0.8 pips (Standard) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, IC Markets provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | HFM | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 1.0 pips (Premium) | 0.0 pips (Zero) | 0.0 pips (Raw) | 0.8 pips (Standard) |
| Commission Defaults | $3.00/lot (Zero Account) | $3.50/lot (Raw Spread) |
| Execution Model | STP / ECN capabilities | True ECN |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 24 hours | 24-48 hours |
Safety & Regulation: Is HFM or IC Markets Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both HFM and IC Markets are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. HFM is armed with 2 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2010. IC Markets, licensed since 2007, counters with 2 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. They are evenly matched in terms of top-tier trust metrics. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.
HFM
Tier 1- Regulators:FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)DFSA (Dubai)FSCA (South Africa)FSA (Seychelles)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (EU) / £85,000 (UK)
- Licensed Since: 2010
IC Markets
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)Seychelles FSASCB (Bahamas)
- Investor Protection: ASIC client money rules & European ICF
- Licensed Since: 2007
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. HFM equips its clients with MT4, MT5, HFM App. IC Markets, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView. If you rely on cTrader capabilities, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | HFM | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (Mobile Only) | |
| Copy Trading Network | Yes (HFcopy) |
Pros & Cons: HFM vs IC Markets
HFM
Pros
- Excellent mobile app functionality with in-app trading
- No minimum deposit required to start
- Zero account features competitive 0.0 pip spreads with low commission
- Massive variety of bonus and promotional programs (outside EU/UK)
- Cent accounts available for micro-trading
Cons
- No proprietary desktop platform (relies on MT4/MT5)
- Account types and regulations can be confusing to navigate
- Not available to US or Canadian traders
IC Markets
Pros
- Consistently deepest liquidity and tightest raw spreads (0.0)
- Servers located in NY4 & LD5 datacenters for <40ms latency
- No restrictions on scalping, hedging, or EAs
- Excellent support for cTrader and TradingView
- Massive global trading volume
Cons
- Customer service can be slower during peak times
- Protection and leverage depend heavily on your account entity
- Basic research and educational material
Expert Verdict: HFM vs IC Markets
When we place HFM and IC Markets side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. HFM, licensed since 2010, has carved out a massive niche focusing on bonus hunters, high leverage users & versatile traders. Their execution model heavily leans into STP / ECN capabilities, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, IC Markets, operational out of Sydney, Australia, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for scalpers, ea traders & low-latency algorithmic trading. Their $3.50/lot (Raw Spread) commission structure combined with 0.0 pips (Raw) | 0.8 pips (Standard) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is excellent mobile app functionality with in-app trading, and you intend to start with a minimum of $0, HFM is the logical path forward. If, however, you value consistently deepest liquidity and tightest raw spreads (0.0) and require MT4, IC Markets edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
HFM vs IC Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
People Also Search For
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated August 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Editorial Policy | Data Sources | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy