Head-to-Head Comparison

For Traders vs FTMO (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare For Traders against FTMO across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

For Traders logo

For Traders

8/10
Up to 90% split·Up to $100,000
FTMO logo

FTMO

9/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, FTMO edges out the competition in this matchup. While For Traders remains an excellent choice for forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Quick Comparison

MetricFor TradersFTMOWinner
Founded20232015Draw
Overall Rating8/109/10FTMO
Profit SplitUp to 90%80%For Traders
Max Account Size$100,000$200,000FTMO
Lowest Challenge Fee$9999$155FTMO
Payout FrequencyOn demand after qualifying (payout cycles per program)On demand after 14 daysDraw
Minimum Payout$100$20 bank / $50 cryptoDraw
PlatformsMT5, cTraderMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeFTMO
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksFTMO
Challenge Types22Draw
HeadquartersPrague, Czech RepublicPrague, Czech RepublicDraw

For Traders vs FTMO: Challenge Fees Compared

For Traders offers 2 account tiers with fees starting from $9999. FTMO counters with 5 options starting from $155. FTMO is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

For Traders Fees

$50,000See site
$100,000See site

FTMO Fees

$10,000€155
$25,000€250
$50,000€345
$100,000€540
$200,000€1,080

Trading Rules: For Traders vs FTMO

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. For Traders enforces a max drawdown of 6% trailing (of highest balance) and daily drawdown of Per program, with a profit target of 9–11%. FTMO sets a max drawdown at 10% trailing / 10% static and daily drawdown at 3% / 5%, requiring traders to hit 10% / 10% + 5%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleFor TradersFTMO
Max Drawdown6% trailing (of highest balance)10% trailing / 10% static
Daily DrawdownPer program3% / 5%
Profit Target9–11%10% / 10% + 5%
Profit SplitUp to 90%80%

Platform & Tools Comparison

For Traders supports MT5, cTrader. FTMO provides access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. FTMO offers more platform variety.

MT5
For: FTMO:
cTrader
For: FTMO:
MT4
For: FTMO:
DXtrade
For: FTMO:

Pros & Cons

For Traders

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog
Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place
Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison
Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like For Traders
Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture
Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site
Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms
Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

FTMO

One of the most established prop firms (since 2015)
Paid out over $500 million in rewards
Now offering both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations
Up to 90% profit split with scaling
Wide range of tradeable instruments
2-step evaluation process takes longer
Strict daily drawdown rules (5%)
No news trading on some accounts
Higher challenge fees compared to newer firms

Expert Analysis

When placing For Traders and FTMO side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. For Traders, operating since 2023 out of Prague, Czech Republic, has built its model around 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge evaluations with a Up to 90% profit split and accounts up to $100,000. Their platform offering (MT5, cTrader) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. FTMO, headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic since 2015, takes a different approach with 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge models, offering 80% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks. The Bottom Line: If you value now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog, For Traders is the logical choice. If you prefer one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and want access to MT4, FTMO earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
FTMO
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
For Traders
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FTMO
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FTMO
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is For Traders better than FTMO?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **FTMO** edges out the competition in this matchup. While For Traders remains an excellent choice for forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: For Traders or FTMO?

For Traders offers a Up to 90% profit split, while FTMO offers 80%. For Traders gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: For Traders or FTMO?

For Traders's lowest challenge fee is $9999, while FTMO starts at $155. FTMO is the more affordable option.

What platforms do For Traders and FTMO support?

For Traders supports MT5, cTrader. FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade.

Are For Traders and FTMO legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. For Traders was founded in 2023 and is based in Prague, Czech Republic. FTMO was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons

Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn commissions from partner links.|Risk Warning: Trading leveraged products involves significant risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors.